![]() ![]() I mean, swing pedantic that regular is too heavy, Montserrat is great and versatile because it has so many weights, it's clear and clean.Īrcher is the same, however I really don't find it goes well digitally. The trick is to use the medium weight on screen, and the book weight in printed copy.Īre there any fonts that I've overlooked? my only issue is that a 1080p/1440p monitor doesn't quite do it justice, but I've heard at 4K it looks sublime.Īrcher - virtually perfect for the modern era. either a) slight variations on classic fonts which bring nothing new to the table, or b) poor quality/unfinished/eccentric styleĪvenir Next - extremely legible and clear on and off screen. Various popular free serifs from Google Fonts etc. Rockwell Light - fairly good, but proportions feel a bit too large. Also they have the baggage of being designed for ink and printing presses rather than LCDs and laser printers. the go-to serif classics all appear too heavy and fatiguing on screen, although great in print. This was designed for VGA 72 dpi monitors and thus its style was constrained by the pixels available.Ĭaslon, Minion Pro, Palotino etc. Helvetica Now - very clear on screen but at the cost of being simple and bland. Also, it feels like a historical style, rather than a modern or timeless one. So many fonts I tried the Light was too light, and the Regular/Book/Medium too heavy for a sharp modern display.Īdobe Garamond Pro - this seems to be the aggregate "best of all time font", however I found it just doesn't work too well on screen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |